Skip to content
FREE SHIPPING ON ALL DOMESTIC ORDERS $35+
FREE SHIPPING ON ALL US ORDERS $35+

Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War

Availability:
in stock, ready to be shipped
Original price $19.50 - Original price $19.50
Original price $19.50
$27.99
$27.99 - $27.99
Current price $27.99
Charles Dew’s Apostles of Disunion has established itself as a modern classic and an indispensable account of the Southern states’ secession from the Union. Addressing topics still hotly debated among historians and the public at large more than a century and a half after the Civil War, the book offers a compelling and clearly substantiated argument that slavery and race were at the heart of our great national crisis. The fifteen years since the original publication of Apostles of Disunion have seen an intensification of debates surrounding the Confederate flag and Civil War monuments. In a powerful new afterword to this anniversary edition, Dew situates the book in relation to these recent controversies and factors in the role of vast financial interests tied to the internal slave trade in pushing Virginia and other upper South states toward secession and war.

ISBN-13: 9780813939445

Media Type: Paperback(Fifteenth Anniversary Edition)

Publisher: University of Virginia Press

Publication Date: 02-03-2017

Pages: 168

Product Dimensions: 5.40(w) x 8.90(h) x 0.60(d)

Age Range: 18 Years

Series: A Nation Divided

Charles B. Dew is Ephraim Williams Professor of American History at Williams College and the author of The Making of a Racist: A Southerner Reflects on Family, History, and the Slave Trade (Virginia) and Bond of Iron: Master and Slave at Buffalo Forge, selected as a New York Times Notable Book of the Year.

What People are Saying About This

Mark E. Neely

Charles B. Dew offers a penetrating and incisive evaluation of secessionist ideology, with a clear eye to the priority of race over issues of constitutional rights. The principal source on which the book is built certainly appears neglected to me, and the source is worthy of exploitation: we have an opportunity here to see what Southerners said to each other and not what they said primarily to the North or to the world.