An influential body of recent work on moral psychology has stressed the interconnections among ethics, narrative, and empathy. Yet as Patrick Colm Hogan argues, this work is so vague in its use of the term 'narrative' as to be almost substanceless, and this vagueness is in large part due to the neglect of literary study. Extending his previous work on universal story structures, Hogan argues that we can transform ill-defined intuitions about narrative and ethics into explicit and systematic accounts of the deep connections between moral attitudes and narratives. These connections are, in turn, inseparable from empathy, a concept that Hogan proceeds to clarify and defend against a number of widely read critiques. In the course of the book, Hogan develops and illustrates his arguments through analyses of global narratives, constructing illuminating ethical interpretations of literary works ranging from Shakespeare to Chinese drama and the Bhagavad Gita.
ISBN-13: 9781009169493
Media Type: Paperback
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication Date: 12-07-2023
Pages: 316
Product Dimensions: 9.00h x 6.00w x 0.67d
Series: Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction
Patrick Colm Hogan, Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor in the English Department and the Cognitive Science Program at the University of Connecticut, is the author of over twenty scholarly books, including The Mind and Its Stories: Narrative Universals and Human Emotion (Cambridge University Press, 2003) and What Literature Teaches Us About Emotion (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
Table of Contents
Introduction: What (comparative) literature tells us about ethics; 1. Defining ethics; 2. The implied ethics of Julius Caesar; 3. Narrative universals, emotion, and ethics; 4. Ethics and narrative genre: Some illustrative cases; 5. Emotion and empathy; 6. The dynamics of empathic response: Simulation and inference in A Midsummer Night's Dream; 7. Evaluating empathy; 8. The critical empathy of Angels in America; Afterword: The limits of ethics – On free will and blame.
